Bookstore HomeRocky Mountain GeologyContributions to GeologyGeology of WyomingS.H. Knight MemoirOrder
 
Subscribe
Submissions
Reviewers
Archive
Issue Pricing
Editorial Board
RMG on GSW
Contact Us
 

VOLUME 40 NUMBER 1


Evidence for marine influence on a low-gradient coastal plain: Ichnology and invertebrate paleontology of the lower Tongue River Member (Fort Union Formation, middle Paleocene), western Williston Basin, U.S.A.

Edward S. Belt, Neil E. Tibert, H. Allen Curran, John A. Diemer, Joseph H. Hartman, Timothy J. Kroeger, and David M. Harwood

The Paleocene Tongue River Member of the Fort Union Formation contains trace-fossil associations indicative of marine influence in otherwise freshwater facies. The identified ichnogenera include: Arenicolites, Diplocraterion, Monocraterion, Ophiomorpha, Rhizocorallium, Skolithos linearis, Teichichnus, Thalassinoides, and one form of uncertain affinity. Two species of the marine diatom Coscinodiscus occur a few meters above the base of the member. The burrows occur in at least five discrete, thin, rippled, fine-grained sandstone beds within the lower 85 m of the member west of the Cedar Creek anticline (CCA) in the Signal Butte, Terry Badlands, and Pine Hills areas. Two discrete burrowed beds are found in the lower 10 m of the member east of the CCA in the little Missouri River area.

Abundant freshwater ostracodes include Bisulcocypridea arvadensis, Candona, and Cypridopsis. Freshwater bivalves include Plesielliptio and Pachydon mactriformis. We recognize four fossil assemblages that represent fluvio-lacustrine, proximal estuarine, central estuarine, and distal estuarine environments. Biostratal alternations between fresh- and brackish-water assemblages indicate that the Tongue River Member was deposited along a low-gradient coastal plain that was repeatedly inundated from the east by the Cannonball Sea.

The existence of marine-influenced beds in the Tongue River Member invalidates the basis for the Slope Formation.

Key Words: bivalves • diatoms • estuarine environment • Fort Union Formation • Tongue River Member • Ostracoda • trace fossils • Paleocene • Williston Basin

Triassic paleosol catenas associated with a salt-withdrawal minibasin in southeastern Utah, U.S.A.

Shane J. Prochnow, Lee C. Nordt, Stacy C. Atchley, Michael Hudec, and Thomas E. Boucher

Catenas for lithified paleosols have been rarely described in the literature because they are seldom preserved and, where present, are difficult to trace laterally. This study focuses on paleocatenas associated with a Triassic salt-withdrawal minibasin (rim syncline). The catenary surfaces formed during an episode of pro-longed landscape stability along a margin of a salt-withdrawal minibasin and were identified by a series of continuous, high-resolution photopanoramas of canyon outcrops. The paleocatenas had paleoslopes of ~1%, and were laterally extensive over distances ranging from ~2.8 to ~7.9 km. Paleocatenas within the Chinle are associated with lateral taxonomic differences in paleosol morphology. A paleocatena formed on the upper boundary of the lower Chinle has well-drained alfisols on its upper slopes and a poorly drained, over-thickened inceptisol at the toe of the slope. A second paleocatena documented within the upper Chinle includes inceptisols with carbonate nodules characterized by thick paleosols on upper slopes and thin paleosols at the toe slope. Solum thickness, horizon thickness, color, and profile development index (PDI) values were evaluated relative to slope position. Solum thickness, E horizon thickness, Bt horizon thickness, and PDI values have relatively robust covariance to slope position, which suggests that they were influenced by pedotopographic factors. The Bw horizon thickness, Bk horizon thickness, and BC horizon thickness have less robust correlation to slope, and may instead, reflect the influence of other soil forming factors. Both paleocatenas were probably unstable, a conclusion supported by evidence for downslope sediment movement. Upper-slope paleosols have truncated surfaces whereas toe-slope paleosols were either buried or over thickened due to cumulic aggradation. Soil development along the paleocatenas was influenced primarily by erosion, deposition and soil-moisture processes, similar to modern catenas. Thus, landscapes associated with these salt tectonic features significantly influenced paleosol morphology in the Chinle.

Key Words: alfisol • catena • Chinle Formation • halokinesis • inceptisol • minibasin • paleopedology • paleosol • pedotype • toposequence • salt • soil • solum • Triassic • unconformity

William Lee Stokes: Earth historian from Hiawatha

M. Dane Picard

Key Words: History of geology • biography • Utah • Great Basin • Earth history • teaching

Structural analysis of a Laramide, basement-involved, foreland fault zone, Rawlins uplift, south-central Wyoming

Aaron S. Otteman and Arthur W. Snoke

The western border of the Hanna Basin is defined by the Rawlins uplift, a Laramide, basement-involved, faulted arch. This north-northwest south-southeast-trending structure separates the Hanna Basin on the east from the Great Divide Basin (part of the greater Green River depositional basin) on the west. The Rawlins uplift is a west southwest-vergent, macroscale, fault-related fold. Detailed geologic mapping, construction of serial cross sections, and the incorporation of data from a seismic-reflection profile indicate that displacement along the fault zone flanking the uplift's western margin cannot account for the net structural relief between the Hanna and Great Divide Basins (~37,000 vertical ft [~11,285 vertical m] and ~27,000 vertical ft [~8,235 vertical m], respectively). The exposed frontal fault traces are interpreted as high-angle (~70) splays off a shallowly dipping (~25), master fault zone developed within Archean granitic rocks of the Wyoming province. A low-dipping, braided, plastic-to-brittle thrust-fault zone in the Precambrian basement is inferred to accommodate much of the fault displacement and thus account for the structural relief between the core of the uplift and the adjacent basins. Within the study area, displacement along the exposed frontal fault zone decreases from south to north. Within the map area, bedding attitudes along the southwest limb (forelimb) of the uplift range from ~3090 with only local areas of overturned beds. However, southwest of the map area, Upper Cretaceous strata are sub-vertical to overturned. On the homoclinal backlimb, dips are ~1015 east-northeast into the Hanna Basin. Eastward structural bends at the southern and northern margins of the uplift suggest a component of left-lateral, oblique-slip displacement along the southern margin and right-lateral, oblique-slip displacement along the northern margin. Pre-existing basement anisotropies or discontinuities are likely responsible for these important changes in structural grain.

Key Words: Laramide orogeny • fault-related arch • basement-involved uplift • brittle fault zone • Rocky Mountain foreland deformation • Rawlins uplift • Wyoming

Origin of Cretaceous to Holocene fractures in the northern San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico

Jason C. Ruf and Eric A. Erslev

The timing and origins of minor faults and extensional fractures (joints) in the San Juan Basin of the Rocky Mountain foreland have generated intense debate. Hypotheses include nearly syn-sedimentary fracturing guided by pre-existing Precambrian weaknesses, syn-Laramide fracturing, and overburden-release jointing during Holocene erosion. Furthermore, the Laramide deformation that formed the San Juan Basin is also poorly resolved, with hypotheses including single-stage, unidirectional shortening and multi-stage, multidirectional shortening. The stress and fracture history of the basin is critical for predicting subsurface fracture trends that can control hydrocarbon and aquifer permeability and production.

In order to test fracture and tectonic hypotheses, minor fault (n = 842) and joint (n = 2619) data were collected from 76 outcrops of Jurassic through Paleogene rocks in the northern San Juan Basin. Multiple conjugate sets of minor faults with consistent crosscutting relationships indicate multi-directional shortening with four episodes of deformation: (1) N56E Laramide shortening, (2) N55W shortening, (3) N17E post-Laramide shortening, and (4) N59E post-Laramide extension. Most joint localities show two regional joint sets, a dominant J1 set and a secondary J2 set. Joints in J1 sets have two distinct orientations: a N19W average strike (47 stations) and a N32E average strike (6 stations). J2 cross-joint sets have a N72E average strike and were probably generated at shallow depths. Subsurface information for the Dakota Sandstone from a well in the basin indicates two sets of N14W- and N18E-striking fractures, similar to J1 surface joint sets.

NE-striking coal cleats are oblique to the main NNE-trending Laramide shortening and perpendicular to the later NW-trending shortening. They may have formed either during earlier shortening related to the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt or during tectonic rebound from the last Laramide shortening. NNE-striking J1 joints are parallel to the last phase of local shortening and to Miocene mafic dikes, suggesting formation during post-Laramide extension. Subsequent NNW-striking J1 joints are parallel to local normal faults and may represent either regional Neogene extension or tectonic rebound from the main Laramide shortening. J2 cross joint sets in sandstones formed perpendicular to both bedding and J1 joints during uplift and erosion and thus probably do not extend far below the surface.

The NNW- and NNE-striking J1 joints may be open at depth and may act as preferential flow pathways for fluids. Nearer to the surface, systematic cross-joints (J2) increase fracture density, which may be important for shallow aquifers and coalbed methane plays.

Key Words: Joints • fractures • faults • Laramide orogeny • San Juan Basin • Colorado • New Mexico

   
Bookstore Home | Rocky Mountain Geology | Geology of Wyoming |
Contributions to Geology | S.H. Knight Memoir | Order | Contact Us
Any comments, problems, or questions concerning this website? Contact the webmaster.
©UW Department of Geology and Geophysics