Bookstore HomeRocky Mountain GeologyContributions to GeologyGeology of WyomingS.H. Knight MemoirOrder
 
Subscribe
Submissions
Reviewers
Archive
Issue Pricing
Editorial Board
RMG on GSW
Contact Us
 

Rocky Mountain Geology 36.2


Middle Cambrian offshore microbialites and shoaling successions, western Wyoming: Implications for regional paleogeography

Larry T. Middleton

Middle and Upper Cambrian strata in western Wyoming and throughout the Rocky Mountain region comprise relatively thick successions of nearshore and shelf siliciclastics and carbonates deposited during numerous marine transgressions and regressions. The overall pattern is one of an offshore (westward) transition from coarse-grained facies of the Flathead Sandstone into fine-grained siliciclastic and carbonate strata of the Gros Ventre and Gallatin Groups. Within each formation there is clear evidence of upsection shallowing conditions. This was due to shoreline progradation and/or development of offshore peritidal carbonate buildups

The Middle Cambrian Death Canyon Limestone of the Gros Ventre Group contains both small-scale (typically less than a few meters thick) and larger scale (up to 10 m) cycles of shoaling-upward carbonates. The formation can be divided into lower and upper cliff-forming units. The lower cliff-forming unit is comprised of laminated dolomitic mudstones and packestones near the base that pass upward into fossiliferous and peloidal wackestones and packstones. Near the top of the lower unit intraclastic packstones occur. The overall trend reflects a transition from quiet water, subtidal settings to shallower subtidal and possibly intertidal conditions.

The upper cliff-forming part of the formation contains the most striking evidence of shallow, peritidal deposition. This includes an overall increase upsection in the percentage of allochems such as peloids, ooids, intraclasts, and oncoids. Near the contact with the overlying Park Shale, the Death Canyon Limestone contains large microbial buildups in the forms of thrombolites and stromatolites. These domical mounds are up to 1 m in height and 1.5 m in width at their base. Thrombolites exhibit a coarse, clotted fabric and laminae, if present, are indistinct. The stromatolites are well laminated with the outer surface displaying small, discrete knobs. Associated with these buildups are inter-mound packstones containing ooids, large intraclasts, and skeletal debris. Flat-pebble conglomerates also occur locally. These algal mounds and the associated facies are similar to those found in modern shallow subtidal areas and lower intertidal flats. A depositional model of peritidal sedimentation around offshore, low-relief islands and within tidal channels is proposed. Thus, the upper Death Canyon Limestone comprises shoaling-upward successions that developed far offshore of the Middle Cambrian strand-line.

Keywords: microbialites, shoaling successions, paleogeography, Cambrian, Wyoming

Geochemistry and tectonic setting of Paleoproterozoic metavolcanic rocks of the southern Front Range, lower Arkansas River Canyon and northern Wet Mountains, central Colorado

R. A. WOBUS, M. J. FOLLEY, K. M. WEARN, AND J. B. NOBLETT

Across a 5000-km2 area of central Colorado, previously unstudied Paleoproterozoic metabasalts (amphibolites) and metarhyolites (felsic gneisses) comprise a bimodal metavolcanic association within a dominantly metasedimentary terrain. Extending southward from about 39° N latitude in the Southern Front Range to about 38° 15' N latitude in the Wet Mountains, and from the mountain front westward to the Wet Mountain Valley and Pleasant Valley fault system, this area includes the exceptional exposures within the lower Arkansas River Canyon from Howard downstream to Canon City. Regional metamorphism from garnet to sillimanite grade, pervasive deformation, and intrusion by three generations of Proterozoic plutons have largely obscured original stratigraphic relationships and primary structures within these metamorphic basement rocks, although a few pyroclastic features persist locally within the felsic members. These metavolcanic rocks are compositionally similar to the much better preserved bimodal section in the Salida area, dated at 1728 ± 6 Ma by Bickford (1986), which emerges from beneath Paleozoic cover rocks about 15 km beyond the western edge of the area of this report.

Geochemical studies of 45 samples (30 amphibolites and 15 felsic gneisses) delineate two groups of metavolcanic rocks ranging in silica content from 45–55% in one group and from 65 to almost 80% in the other. Along a 100-km transect from north to south, metavolcanic rocks of the lower-silica group (amphibolites) show an increase in total alkalies (from 2% t o 5–6%) and large ion lithophile trace elements as well as an increase in degree of enrichment in light rare earth elements (from LaN/LuN < 2 to LaN/LuN ~5). Rocks with higher silica content (felsic metavolcanic rocks) occur mostly in the Arkansas Canyon area and contain 6–8% total alkalies; they show strong fractionation between light and heavy rare earth elements with moderate to pronounced negative europium anomalies.

Tectonic discriminant diagrams using relatively immobile high-field-strength elements indicate volcanic arc settings for both mafic and felsic populations. Metavolcanic rocks from the northern Wet Mountains and Arkansas Canyon suggest a mature arc environment, possibly on an expanding continental margin. The isolated metabasalts to the north in the southern Front Range, where no felsic metavolcanic rocks have been identified, are more primitive island-arc tholeiites; they may represent pyroclastic rocks with a source beyond the study area.

These new data from a wide area of central Colorado reinforce results from the well-studied Paleoproterozoic bimodal are assemblages to the west near Salida and Gunnison. They also allow the extension across a wider geographic area of previous tectonic models for the Paleoproterozoic evolution of the Colorado province (as defined by Bickford et al., 1986). These models (Condie, 1986; Reed et al., 1987; Karlstrom et al., 1987) portray the rapid addition of juvenile crust to the southern margin of the Wyoming province by accretion of individual volcanic arcs or larger, previously amalgamated are terranes, resulting in the southward expansion of the craton by about 1300 km from 1800–1650 Ma.

Key Words: Paleoproterozoic • central Colorado • bimodal metavolcanic rocks • tectonic setting • volcanic arcs

Origin and emplacement of igneous rocks in the central Wasatch Mountains, Utah

T. A. VOGEL, F. W. CAMBRAY AND K. N. CONSTENIUM

The calc-alkaline igneous rocks in the central Wasatch Mountains were emplaced between 36–30 Ma. They form a belt comprised of eleven stocks and the Keetley volcanic field aligned along the crustal suture between the Archean Wyoming province and accreted Paleoproterozoic terranes. Magmatism associated with this belt and its westward continuation into the Bingham mining district has been related to mid-Cenozoic extension. These rocks consist of two types of stocks based on texture: a western type, which is coarse grained, and mostly equigranular, and an eastern type (including the Keetley volcanic rocks), which is fine grained and porphyritic. The compositional variation in the western stocks (Little Cottonwood, Alta, and Clayton Peak stocks) forms three distinct compositional groups. The compositional variation in the eastern stocks is similar to the compositional variation in the Alta stock. Major and trace element variations in these rocks resemble those of subduction-related magmas. However, the high K2O contents and low {varepsilon}sr values are not consistent with this origin. These magmas formed from melting of mafic igneous rocks. We propose that magmas were generated by decompression melting due to gravitational collapse of the crust that had been thickened during Cretaceous to early Cenozoic deformation. Magmas rose to varying levels in the crust along an east–west lineament. The igneous rocks of the central Wasatch Mountains have {varepsilon}Nd(t) similar to most of the Phanerozoic igneous rocks in the miogeocline (MG), but have significantly lower {varepsilon}Sr(t). That anomaly has been explained as due to melting of a basement long depleted in Rb (Farmer and DePaolo, 1983, 1984). However, the Wasatch igneous belt rocks are high-potassium, calc-alkaline rocks and all have very similar incompatible trace element patterns, whereas only a few MG rocks are calc-alkaline or high potassium. Furthermore, in the MG rocks incompatible trace element patterns are variable. One possible explanation for the dilemma of long-time depletion of Rb in these high-potassium, calc-alkaline rocks is that the crust may have been recently charged with Rb and K during the Sevier-Laramide event (100–40 Ma) by dehydration of the subducting slab. This event was followed by melting during mid-Cenozoic collapse of the orogen (ca. 40–20 Ma). The source of the magmas was melting of mafic rocks in the lower crust. Some of these magmas ponded, formed magma chambers, and differentiated. Some involved little ponding and erupted directly on the surface in the form of the Keetley volcanic field. Continued melting and extension produced new magmas from a similar crustal source. These magmas were emplaced below a series of pull-apart structures associated with strike-slip displacement along an east–west suture. This suture may have been controlled by the Archean-Proterozoic boundary. Some magma bodies were emplaced quickly to the surface without significant fractionation. Others coalesced and fractionated over a protracted period of time. These magma bodies interacted with crustal rocks, and differentiated to relatively evolved compositions.

Key Words: Calc-alkaline magmas • magma evolution • magma generation • magma emplacement • magma ascent • crustal melts • pull-apart structures • extensional duplexes • strike-slip faults • Wasatch Mountains • Sevier orogenic belt

   
Bookstore Home | Rocky Mountain Geology | Geology of Wyoming |
Contributions to Geology | S.H. Knight Memoir | Order | Contact Us
Any comments, problems, or questions concerning this website? Contact the webmaster.
©UW Department of Geology and Geophysics